Skip to content

Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size   
You are here: Home arrow Blog arrow Liberalising postal services
Skip to content

Contact us

Tel +44 (0)20 7222 3546
Fax +44 (0)20 7222 2363
Full contact details

RSS feed

Subscribe to this blog's feed



E-mail list

Keep up-to-date with the work of the GI with our e-mail bulletin every few weeks.

Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Six of the best

CIPE Development Blog
Johan Norberg
Philippe Legrain
Pienso
World Bank PSD
Trade Diversion

Blogroll

About Globalization
Adam Smith Institute
Atlantic Blog
Brian Micklethwait
Business & Economics
Cafe Hayek
Capital Spectator
Catallaxy
Center for Global Development
Chippla's weblog
Civitas Blog
Club for Growth
ConservativeHome
Daniel W. Drezner
David Smith
De Gustibus
EconLog
Franck's blog
Freedom Institute (Ireland)
From the Heartland
Gavin Sheridan
Global Growth Blog
Hillary Johnson
Hit and Run
Iain Dale
IndiaUncut
Institutional Economics
Knowledge Problem
Kurt Johnson
Market Center Blog
Mises Institute
Mutualist Blog
Natalie Solent
ODI
Owen Barder
Pharmopoly
Positive Externality
Private Sector Development
Radley Balko
Right to Create
Rip Mix Burn
Samizdata.net
Sobering thoughts
Social Affairs Unit
Spontaneous Order
TechDirt
The American Mind
The Commons Blog
The Liberal Order
The Welfare State We're In
Tim Worstall
Tom G. Palmer
Trade Diversion
Unrestricted Domain
Vaccines for Development

Liberalising postal services PDF Print E-mail
Written by Alex Singleton   
Friday, 18 February 2005

Royal Mail, Britain's state-owned postal service, is to lose its legal monopoly on the delivery of letters from January 2006. Currently, Royal Mail faces competition on letters if they are sent in batches 4000 or more. Now any quantity of mail will be legally allowed to be delivered by a competiting firm. The liberalization follows on from the success of similar measures in New Zealand and Sweden.

Trade unions are livid. Billy Hayes, general secretary of the Communication Workers' Union, said that: "The Dutch and German post offices in particular must be rubbing their hands in glee at this ill-advised and regrettable decision."

Hayes suggests an often-argued point: it is unfair to liberalize your markets until others do the same.

Should the British therefore protect their postal service until others agree also to liberalize? The British could do that, but it would not be in their interest to do so. Liberalizing the postal service will bring in new ideas from other operators. It will reduce pricing for consumers, and lower costs for business. It will force the monolith that is Royal Mail to modernize. This is good for Britain. Since the British benefit regardless of what other countries do, it is worth doing regardless.

Comments (0) >>
Write comment


Write the displayed characters