Skip to content

Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size   
You are here: Home arrow Blog arrow If Ghana increased protection, the poor would starve
Skip to content

Contact us

Tel +44 (0)20 7222 3546
Fax +44 (0)20 7222 2363
Full contact details

RSS feed

Subscribe to this blog's feed



E-mail list

Keep up-to-date with the work of the GI with our e-mail bulletin every few weeks.

Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Six of the best

CIPE Development Blog
Johan Norberg
Philippe Legrain
Pienso
World Bank PSD
Trade Diversion

Blogroll

About Globalization
Adam Smith Institute
Atlantic Blog
Brian Micklethwait
Business & Economics
Cafe Hayek
Capital Spectator
Catallaxy
Center for Global Development
Chippla's weblog
Civitas Blog
Club for Growth
ConservativeHome
Daniel W. Drezner
David Smith
De Gustibus
EconLog
Franck's blog
Freedom Institute (Ireland)
From the Heartland
Gavin Sheridan
Global Growth Blog
Hillary Johnson
Hit and Run
Iain Dale
IndiaUncut
Institutional Economics
Knowledge Problem
Kurt Johnson
Market Center Blog
Mises Institute
Mutualist Blog
Natalie Solent
ODI
Owen Barder
Pharmopoly
Positive Externality
Private Sector Development
Radley Balko
Right to Create
Rip Mix Burn
Samizdata.net
Sobering thoughts
Social Affairs Unit
Spontaneous Order
TechDirt
The American Mind
The Commons Blog
The Liberal Order
The Welfare State We're In
Tim Worstall
Tom G. Palmer
Trade Diversion
Unrestricted Domain
Vaccines for Development

If Ghana increased protection, the poor would starve PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 18 April 2005

Christian Aid, the British charity, complains that free trade isn't good news for Ghana's rice farmers. They are probably right. But, the needs of the many, as Spock says, outweigh the needs of the few. Free trade in rice means the price of eating is lower, which means a healthier, less hungry population. Free trade is particularly beneficial to the poorest in Ghana, many of whom would starve without it.

In a letter to Christian Aid, the British government supported Ghana's policy of free trade, saying that: "Selective tariffs such as these, which have the effect of raising the price of imported goods or intermediate inputs into the domestic production process in poor countries, can often prove a counterproductive instrument to safeguarding food security and the livelihoods of the poorest households, who are both producers and consumers."

Comments (0) >>
Write comment


Write the displayed characters