Skip to content

Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size   
You are here: Home arrow Blog arrow Coldplay's Chris Martin misses the big picture on fighting poverty
Skip to content

Contact us

Tel +44 (0)20 7222 3546
Fax +44 (0)20 7222 2363
Full contact details

RSS feed

Subscribe to this blog's feed



E-mail list

Keep up-to-date with the work of the GI with our e-mail bulletin every few weeks.

Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Six of the best

CIPE Development Blog
Johan Norberg
Philippe Legrain
Pienso
World Bank PSD
Trade Diversion

Blogroll

About Globalization
Adam Smith Institute
Atlantic Blog
Brian Micklethwait
Business & Economics
Cafe Hayek
Capital Spectator
Catallaxy
Center for Global Development
Chippla's weblog
Civitas Blog
Club for Growth
ConservativeHome
Daniel W. Drezner
David Smith
De Gustibus
EconLog
Franck's blog
Freedom Institute (Ireland)
From the Heartland
Gavin Sheridan
Global Growth Blog
Hillary Johnson
Hit and Run
Iain Dale
IndiaUncut
Institutional Economics
Knowledge Problem
Kurt Johnson
Market Center Blog
Mises Institute
Mutualist Blog
Natalie Solent
ODI
Owen Barder
Pharmopoly
Positive Externality
Private Sector Development
Radley Balko
Right to Create
Rip Mix Burn
Samizdata.net
Sobering thoughts
Social Affairs Unit
Spontaneous Order
TechDirt
The American Mind
The Commons Blog
The Liberal Order
The Welfare State We're In
Tim Worstall
Tom G. Palmer
Trade Diversion
Unrestricted Domain
Vaccines for Development

Coldplay's Chris Martin misses the big picture on fighting poverty PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 21 April 2005

2005-04-21-coldplay.jpgColdplay's Chris Martin had an article in The Times last week:

I was in Ghana with Oxfam, to renew Coldplay's commitment to the campaign to Make Trade Fair and to learn more about how the trade rules are skewed against the world's poorest people. The farmers I met in these valleys weren't passive victims. They were educated, articulate - and angry. They didn't want to be dependent on the rains, and they knew exactly what was needed to make this land work all year round. The valleys needed to be properly irrigated (they'd costed this at around £600,000 - pocket change when you consider what Ghana pays in interest to the West on loans), they needed a combine harvester, and perhaps some tractors. With this they could offer employment to many, and more importantly they could produce enough rice to feed the whole of the country.

But no one from the Government had been to see them about such an important proposal because when Ghana took a World Bank loan in 1983, it was told it could no longer subsidise or help its farmers in any way. So, instead of growing its own rice, Ghana is flooded with cheap grain from overseas. In the markets you'll find sacks of perfumed rice from Thailand and Vietnam, but mainly polished, heavily processed white rice from America: part of the surplus produced by heavily subsidised US farmers. Unwanted at home, it is dumped cheaply in the developing world along with frozen EU poultry pieces, cans of Italian tomato paste and other food we pay our farmers to produce, even though we don't need it.

So Mr Martin suggests that the World Bank is responsible for actions of the Ghanan government. If true, the World Bank deserves praise. In the past twenty years, poverty in Ghana has been in decline, and the country has been growing faster than any other West African country. Rice growers might not like open borders, but imported rice has meant cheaper food, helping millions of poor people to eat more. Mr Martin's protectionism might seem a way of fighting poverty: in practice it would cause the poorest to starve.

Comments (0) >>
Write comment


Write the displayed characters