Globalisation Institute

Six of the best

CIPE Development Blog
Johan Norberg
Philippe Legrain
Pienso
World Bank PSD
Trade Diversion

Blogroll

About Globalization
Adam Smith Institute
Atlantic Blog
Brian Micklethwait
Business & Economics
Cafe Hayek
Capital Spectator
Catallaxy
Center for Global Development
Chippla's weblog
Civitas Blog
Club for Growth
ConservativeHome
Daniel W. Drezner
David Smith
De Gustibus
EconLog
Franck's blog
Freedom Institute (Ireland)
From the Heartland
Gavin Sheridan
Global Growth Blog
Hillary Johnson
Hit and Run
Iain Dale
IndiaUncut
Institutional Economics
Knowledge Problem
Kurt Johnson
LibertarianHome
Market Center Blog
Merciar Business Consulting
Mises Institute
Mutualist Blog
Natalie Solent
ODI
Owen Barder
Pharmopoly
Positive Externality
Private Sector Development
Radley Balko
Right to Create
Rip Mix Burn
Samizdata.net
Sobering thoughts
Social Affairs Unit
Spontaneous Order
TechDirt
The American Mind
The Commons Blog
The Liberal Order
The Welfare State We're In
Tim Worstall
Tom G. Palmer
Trade Diversion
Unrestricted Domain
Vaccines for Development

Read us via RSS

If you use an RSS reader, you can subscribe to this blog with this link.

Contact us

Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5101
47 Bedford Street
Covent Garden
London
WC2E 9HA
Full contact details

Home Blog More than just a good vacuum...
More than just a good vacuum... PDF
Written by Richard Howard   
Monday, 05 February 2007
As an article in this week's Economist shows, James Dyson does not just provide the world with colourful vacuum cleaners, he has also provided a fantastic example of the benefits of globalisation in action. Dyson vacuums were originally made in Wiltshire but production was shifted to Malaysia at the turn of the century. This allowed Dyson to be within a ten mile radius of all suppliers, with a bigger factory (he now has 3) and a cheaper workforce, at one-third the price of his British one. All this has led to a four-fold rise in the number of vacuum cleaners being made.

However, this is not a sad story of British manufacturing jobs lost to a cheaper workforce, with the unlucky Brit left standing in the dole queue. The Wiltshire plant has now been turned into a research and development centre, which employs more people now than in its manufacturing days and in higher skilled and better paid jobs. This is a prime example of how globalisation can benefit both developed and developing countries. With historical links still in place, Britain is in pole position to take advantage of the outsourcing of low skilled jobs in order to create better paid, higher skilled jobs at home.

However, for globalisation to work effectively, many developing nations still need to do more . The Economist points out that even in India, "Infrastructure, such as roads and power, and public services, such as education and drinking water, are woefully inadequate and limit growth." If developing nations are going to ride the globalisation wave successfully and turn it into prolonged economic success, these issues need to be addressed. Developing countries, such as India and Malaysia, need to press ahead with market reforms and investment, particularly in education. After all, what's the point of a company building shiny new offices in Delhi, if there are not enough educated people to work in it?
Comments (0) >>
Write comment


Write the displayed characters


 
< Prev   Next >