E-mail list
Keep up-to-date with the work of the GI with our e-mail bulletin every few weeks.
Six of the best
CIPE Development BlogJohan Norberg
Philippe Legrain
Pienso
World Bank PSD
Trade Diversion
Blogroll
About Globalization
Adam Smith Institute
Atlantic Blog
Brian Micklethwait
Business & Economics
Cafe Hayek
Capital Spectator
Catallaxy
Center for Global Development
Chippla's weblog
Civitas Blog
Club for Growth
ConservativeHome
Daniel W. Drezner
David Smith
De Gustibus
EconLog
Franck's blog
Freedom Institute (Ireland)
From the Heartland
Gavin Sheridan
Global Growth Blog
Hillary Johnson
Hit and Run
Iain Dale
IndiaUncut
Institutional Economics
Knowledge Problem
Kurt Johnson
Market Center Blog
Mises Institute
Mutualist Blog
Natalie Solent
ODI
Owen Barder
Pharmopoly
Positive Externality
Private Sector Development
Radley Balko
Right to Create
Rip Mix Burn
Samizdata.net
Sobering thoughts
Social Affairs Unit
Spontaneous Order
TechDirt
The American Mind
The Commons Blog
The Liberal Order
The Welfare State We're In
Tim Worstall
Tom G. Palmer
Trade Diversion
Unrestricted Domain
Vaccines for Development
| The global warming debate |
|
|
|
| Written by Alex Singleton | |
| Sunday, 06 February 2005 | |
|
The Economist's current issue has an informative article about the global warming debate. Bjorn Lomborg's Copenhagen Consensus gets discussed. Lomborg's contribution to the debate is important because he addresses the problem that given that, at any time, governments have a limited amount of money to spend on the world's problems. Politics involves prioritizing those problems. Kyoto's supporters appear to ignore this. They support a policy which will have almost no effect; the money could be used to better effect by spending it on other, more pressing, problems - like AIDS and clean drinking water. |