Globalisation Institute

Six of the best

CIPE Development Blog
Johan Norberg
Philippe Legrain
World Bank PSD
Made in Hong Kong
Trade Diversion

EU blogs

Centre for European Reform
Daniel Hannan
FT Brussels Blog
Kosmopolit
Margot Wallstrom
Open Europe

Blogroll

About Globalization
Adam Smith Institute
Atlantic Blog
Brian Micklethwait
Business & Economics
Cafe Hayek
Capital Spectator
Catallaxy
Center for Global Development
Chippla's weblog
Civitas Blog
Club for Growth
ConservativeHome
Daniel W. Drezner
David Smith
De Gustibus
EconLog
Franck's blog
From the Heartland
Gavin Sheridan
Global Growth Blog
Hillary Johnson
Hit and Run
Iain Dale
IndiaUncut
Institutional Economics
Knowledge Problem
Kurt Johnson
Market Center Blog
MarketMeeting.eu
Merciar Business Consulting
Mises Institute
Mutualist Blog
Natalie Solent
ODI
Owen Barder
Pienso
Positive Externality
Private Sector Development
Radley Balko
Right to Create
Samizdata.net
Sobering thoughts
Social Affairs Unit
Spontaneous Order
TechDirt
The American Mind
The Commons Blog
The Liberal Order
The Welfare State We're In
Tim Worstall
Tom G. Palmer
Trade Diversion
Unrestricted Domain
Vaccines for Development

Subscribe to this blog

If you use an RSS reader, you can subscribe to this blog with this link.

You can also get new blog entries delivered to your email inbox each mornining by entering your email address here:

Contact us

Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5101
47 Bedford Street
Covent Garden
London
WC2E 9HA
Full contact details

Home Blog Old McDonald had a farm...
Old McDonald had a farm... PDF
Written by Tom Clougherty   
Tuesday, 09 January 2007
I was on More4 News last night discussing McDonald's decision to source every bean of its coffee (in the UK) from farms certified by the Rainforest Alliance. Some might assume that this is another "Fair trade" scheme, based on subsidising a minority of farmers and thus perpetuating the chronic overproduction that causes low prices in the first place.

In fact, the Rainforest Alliance is very different from Fairtrade - and is an altogether more commendable organisation. Unlike Fairtrade they do not charge a premium or guarantee a minimum price. Instead the Rainforest Alliance - an independent non-profit organisation - only certifies farms that meet certain social and environmental standards, as well as providing training, advice and improved access to credit. The market alone determines the prices paid to farmers - and if Rainforest Alliance farmers do get paid more it is simply because they are adding value to their product. Importantly, and again unlike Fairtrade, the Rainforest Alliance does not make political assumptions about the organisation of labour. Any can be certified if they meet the required standards.

McDonald's announcement is a welcome reminder that big business is not the enemy of world development. Indeed, it can be an extremely positive force. Moreover, their decision shows that government regulation and state intervention are not required to make business "ethical". Markets represent a constant referendum, where people vote with their money - markets thus represent people’s preferences. If consumers demand ethical products then businesses like McDonald's will provide them. Their intention may be to increase profits, but that isn't really the point.

My only reservation about this announcement - which I expressed on More4 last night - is that the Rainforest Alliance's focus seems to be on Central and South American countries like Mexico and Brazil. While these countries remain poor by our standards they are fast emerging economies that can fend for themselves in the international marketplace and which are naturally developing higher social and environmental standards as they become wealthier. Africa, where coffee drinking was invented, is not doing so well. If big corporations really want to do something for world poverty, they could do far worse than investing in African produce and African farmers.